• Calendar
  • Committees
  • Consultations
  • Decisions
  • Election results
  • ePetitions
  • Forthcoming Decisions
  • Forward Plans
  • Library
  • Meetings
  • Officer Decisions
  • Outside bodies
  • Parish councils
  • Search documents
  • Subscribe to updates
  • Your councillors
  • Your MPs
  • What's new
  • Decision details

    Public Conveniences - Tendering Process

    • Find out more about this issue

    Decision Maker: Cabinet

    Decision status: Recommendations Approved

    Is Key decision?: Yes

    Is subject to call in?: Yes

    Decisions:

    Further to Minute No 02/98 consideration was given to a report by the Head of Environment and Transport (a copy of which is appended in the annex to the Minute Book) seeking approval to a select list of contractors to be invited to tender for the delivery of a public convenience service in the District’s market towns.

     

    In the light of remarks as to the possible removal of a condition appertaining to the requirement for a guarantee from the parent company on behalf of one of the companies from which it was proposed to invite a tender, it was

     

    RESOLVED

     

      (a)  that, subject to further checking and to the relevant Directors being satisfied with the proposal, the requirement for a parent company guarantee be dispensed with in the case of the second company listed in the table referred to in paragraph 4.3 of the report now submitted;

     

      (b)  that the first, fourth and sixth companies referred to in paragraph 4.3 of the report also be invited to tender for the delivery of a public convenience service in the District’s market towns;

     

      (c)  that the Director of Operational Services, after consultation with the Executive Councillor for Service Delivery, be authorised to prepare the specification and associated contract documentation to reflect the content of paragraphs 5.1-5.10 of the report now submitted;

     

      (d)  that the rephasing of capital expenditure in the MTP referred to in paragraphs 6.1-6.4 of the report be noted;

     

      (e)  that the proposals for post-tender negotiations and consultation with the Executive Councillor for Service Delivery be noted; and

     

      (f)  that the Director of Operational Services, after consultation with the Executive Councillor for Service Delivery, be authorised to recommend the final choice of contractor to a future meeting of the Cabinet.

    Reasons for the decision:

    In compliance with audit guidelines and the Council’s Constitution

    Alternative options considered:

    None

    Publication date: 12/08/2003

    Date of decision: 31/07/2003

    Decided at meeting: 31/07/2003 - Cabinet

    Effective from: 12/08/2003

    This decision has been called in by:

    • Councillor Kevin Reynolds who writes Allow members opportunity to look at details in more depth as papers relating to subject were not imdiately available."
    • Councillor John Samuel Watt who writes I recal that the condition of our public conveniences did not score favourably in BVR.,it is for this reason I understood that a studdy was to be set up to determine how this service should be provided in the future,therefore the cabinet decisson may be premiture"

    Accompanying Documents:

    • Restricted enclosure  
    • Restricted enclosure  
    • Restricted enclosure