Issue - meetings

To consider a joint report by the Heads of Planning Services, Operations and Environmental Management Services on consultation responses received on a Masterplan for improvements to the Riverside Park.

It was decided not to proceed with the improvements scheme.

A further report was requested on a limited scheme of maintenance.

Consideration was given to a joint report by the Heads of Planning, Operations and Environmental Management Services (a copy of which is appended in the Minute Book) on the outcome of public consultation on proposals to improve Riverside Park, Huntingdon.  As a result of the views expressed and given the current economic climate, it was suggested that a further review of the programme of work should be undertaken.

RESOLVED

  that a further report be submitted in due course.

To consider a joint report by the Heads of Planning Services, Operations and Environmental Management Services on consultation responses received on a master plan for improvements to the Riverside Park.

(Councillor P L E Bucknell, Executive Councillor for Planning Strategy and Councillors J J Dutton and C R Hyams, Ward Councillors, were in attendance for this Item).

 Following an introduction by the Executive Councillor for Planning Strategy, consideration was given to a report by the Heads of Planning, Operations and Environmental Management Services (a copy of which is appended in the Minute Book) on the outcome of a consultation exercise on proposed improvements to the Riverside Park, Huntingdon which had included a public exhibition, meetings, questionnaires and workshops with young people.  The Panel was advised that the scheme had been split into two phases to reflect the views expressed during the consultation and the financial situation of the Council.  It was hoped that Phase I would be implemented in the current financial year, with Phase II in 2011/2012. 

In response to a question, the Projects and Assets Manager explained that expenditure on moorings was considered necessary in order to improve safety and access.  The Panel was advised that an allocation of £34,000 for the play area was intended to provide outdoor gym equipment and climbing areas, the consultation exercise having shown that youth groups preferred equipment which gave a wider range of play activity and appeal to girls as well as boys.

The Panel raised concern over the allocation of £15,000 for the ‘greening’ of the traffic island at the Bridge Hotel as this formed part of the highway and, as such, was considered to be the responsibility of the County Council. Members also felt that the amount allocated for planting was excessive and did not support the proposed ongoing revenue expenditure of £20,000 per annum for improved maintenance of the wildlife area at the park. 

As Ward Councillors, Councillors Dutton and Hyams addressed the Panel on the report submitted.

RESOLVED

  that the Panel broadly welcome the scheme but feel that Phase II should be regarded as aspirational only at this stage.

  Councillor J A Gray in the Chair.