Issue - meetings

To receive a report providing an update on a number of matters pertaining to parking, including a summary of the impacts on car park usage following the implementation of Civil Parking Enforcement.

The report also sought to confirm the approach to be taken in respect of the implementation of agreed parking increases within the 25/26 MTFS - a 20p increase except for the all-day tariff. The report sought confirmation and delegation to implement the agreed increase, or seek confirmation via Council of the agreement to a Budget Policy variation to remove the planned increase or proceed with an alternative scheme.

The Cabinet has noted the agreed MTFS baseline position in relation to parking charges and in particular the 20p increase, along with the other financial information included in the report.

The Cabinet has recommended to Council: 

i.  to note that Cabinet agreed that the 20p increase as set out in the revenue budget should not be implemented in 2025/26. The detail of the charges will be considered and agreed in 2026/27 and will be considered against an updated Car Parking Strategy; and 

ii.  to delegate authority to the Corporate Director (Finance and Resources) and Section 151 Officer in consultation with the Executive Councillor for Finance and Resources to make necessary changes to the Council’s finances, including movements from Reserves, to ensure that a balanced revenue budget position for 2025/26 is maintained. 

A report by the Head of Economy, Regeneration & Housing was submitted (a copy of which is appended in the Minute Book) providing an update on a number of matters pertaining to parking, including summary of the impacts on car park usage following the implementation of Civil Parking Enforcement. The report also sought to confirm the approach to be taken in respect of the implementation of agreed parking increases within the 25/26 Medium Term Financial Strategy (MTFS) – namely a 20p increase except for the all-day tariff. The report set out a number of options, which were confirmation of the increase and delegation to implement the agreed increase, or seek confirmation via Council of the agreement to a Budget Policy variation to remove the planned increase or proceed with an alternative scheme.

The Executive Councillor for Finance & Resources – Councillor Mickelburgh introduced the report. He clarified that the decision to increase parking charges had been made; the decision in front of Cabinet was whether to reverse that, stay with that decision or do something else. He emphasised the importance of considering factors such as the Civil Parking Enforcement which went live in August, as well as car park usage and dwell time. Some of this data was included in the report but it had not been possible to interpret the data fully, which was why a revised parking strategy was underway. If the decision was taken to not make the increase, the MTFS would remain balanced by the use of reserves. Furthermore, he commented that there was little point in trying to do anything else when the publication of the new MTFS for the next budget year was only four weeks away.

The Cabinet were grateful to the Executive Councillor for Finance & Resources – Councillor Mickelburgh for clarifying how the parking strategy related to the parking charges. A decision could now be made based on the data that was not available when Council agreed the budget in February 2025. Reference was made to the Quarter 2 Finance Report that was considered by Cabinet at its 18th November 2025 meeting, which showed a forecast underspend of £926,000. This meant there was revenue available if the decision was taken to not implement the increase. Going forward, a policy was needed on agreed principles of car parking charges so there did not need to be a deep dive each year and Cabinet endorsed the timeline of that policy being developed. It was intended that the parking strategy would achieve equity in the way the Council supported residents who had cars and residents who used public transport to visit Market Towns across the District. There needed to be a way of encouraging and supporting Towns and Businesses, whilst balancing the fact that the Council had to deliver a service which had a cost to the public. Having a strategy based on data and which was forward looking would enable decisions to be made as appropriate. It also meant that as costs increased, there might be  ...  view the full minutes text for item 58