Agenda, decisions and minutes

To approve as a correct record the Minutes of the meeting of the Cabinet held on 12^th March 2009.

The Minutes of the meeting of the Cabinet held on 19th February 2009 were approved as a correct record and signed by the Chairman.

To receive from Members declarations as to personal and/or prejudicial interests and the nature of those interests in relation to any Agenda item.  Please see notes 1 and 2 below.

No declarations were received.

To consider a report by the Head of Democratic & Central Services summarising the findings of a review of the Council’s democratic structure.

Approved in principle the recommendation’s of the Structure Review Working Group, subject to the views of the Overview and Scrutiny Panels (Service Delivery) and (Service Support) and the Corporate Governance Panel (7^th, 14^th and 16^th April respectively)  and the following specific comments:

·  recommendation (b) – subject to the agreement of financial implications;

·  recommendation (e) – subject to further consideration as to the balance between evening and day time meetings;

·  recommendation (h) – voting rights for co-opted members not supported;

·  recommendation (m) – subject to clarification on how independent members will be included in choosing the subject of debate;

·  recommendation (n) – subject to there being an opportunity for independent Members to choose the subject of debate;

·  recommendation (o) – subject to the deletion of the word “annual”;

·  recommendation (p) – not supported;

·  recommendation (q) – subject to questions being addressed to all elected Members;

·  recommendation (s) – subject to the evaluation of the success of the trial;

·  recommendation (w) – that the Standards Committee continue to meet at 4.00pm with the flexibility to change this if necessary;

·  recommendation (z) – that the Corporate Governance Panel continue to meet at 6.00pm with the flexibility to change this if necessary;

·  recommendation (aa) – that the Working Group be requested to give further consideration to the membership of the Panel and to seek the views of ELAG;

·  recommendation (hh)- subject to it excluding applications to significant partnerships where other arrangements already apply;

·  recommendation (rr) – that the Working Group be invited to consider alternative options for funding.

The Cabinet received a report by the Structure Review Working Group (a copy of which is appended in the Minute Book) summarising the findings of an extensive review of the Council’s democratic structure.

While Executive Councillors supported many of the Group’s recommendations, concerns were expressed in relation to the balance of day and evening meetings and the funding of the costs of the exercise. Specifically Members did not support the proposals to give voting rights to co-opted members on the Overview and Scrutiny Panels and the adoption of a Speaker at Council meetings. At the same time, the Cabinet recognised the need for further discussions with partners over the implementation, funding and boundaries of the proposed neighbourhood forums.

Having thanked the Working Party for their efforts in producing a thorough and comprehensive report, it was noted that the Overview and Scrutiny Panels and the Corporate Governance Panel had been invited to comment on the report prior to final considerations by Cabinet at a special meeting on 17th April 2009.

RESOLVED

that the Overview and Scrutiny Panels and the Corporate Governance Panel be advised that, with the exception of points listed below, the recommendations of the Structure Review Working Group, as summarised in the report now submitted, be endorsed:

·  recommendation (b) – subject to a detailed consideration of the relative workloads of portfolios and the funding of the financial implications;

·  recommendation (e) – subject to further consideration as to the balance between evening and day time meetings;

·  recommendation (h) – the proposal to give voting rights for co-opted members is not supported;

·  recommendation (n) – subject to the opportunity for Independent members to choose the subject of debate alongside opposition parties;

·  recommendation (o) – subject to the deletion of the word “annual”;

·  recommendation (p) – is not supported and further consideration should be given to member support/training;

·  recommendation (q) – subject to questions being addressed to all elected members;

·  recommendation (s) – subject to the prior setting of evaluation criteria for the trial;

·  recommendation (w) – that the Standards Committee continue to meet at 4.00pm and retain the flexibility to change this if necessary;

·  recommendation (z) – that the Corporate Governance Panel continue to meet at 6.00pm and retain the flexibility to change this if necessary;

·  recommendation (aa) – that further consideration be given to the membership of the panel and the views of ELAG;

·  recommendation (dd) – that in the meantime members be encouraged to attend current neighbourhood policing panels;

·  recommendation (rr) –that the Working Group be invited to consider alternative options for funding the proposed changes.