Issue - meetings

To consider a report by the Assistant Director Environment, Growth & Planning.

Endorsed the Making Assets Count principles and noted the County Council’s intention to proceed with the creation of a countywide publicly-owned joint venture (the MAC Public Property Partnership); supported the pragmatic approach taken to date by the authority in respect of maximising the use of our own assets; requested that all further ‘common sense’ sharing opportunities be fully explored and expediently delivered wherever that may be possible and noted that none of the authority’s assets will be committed to or encumbered by this without further reference to Cabinet.

Further to Minute No 11/15, consideration was given to a report by the Assistant Director, Environment, Growth and Planning (a copy of which is appended in the Minute Book) updating Members with progress of the Making Assets Count project which aims to deliver high quality and effective management of public sector assets across Cambridgeshire. The report had been considered by the Overview and Scrutiny Panel (Economic Well-Being) whose comments were relayed to the Cabinet.

Executive Councillors were advised that the MAC Partnership consisted of Cambridgeshire County Council, Cambridgeshire’s District Councils, the Police Service, the Fire Service and some of the local Health Providers.  It was reported that there had been some initial success thus far including the re-letting of office space to accommodate health service requirements at Pathfinder House.

Members’ attention was drawn to a proposal to establish a publicly-owned joint venture vehicle which would enhance the work of the Partnership by delivering projects and managing transferred assets. In recognising the importance of investigating all opportunities and having noted that none of the authority’s assets would be committed to or encumbered by this without further reference to a future meeting, the Cabinet

RESOLVED

(a)   that the Making Assets Count principles, outlined in paragraph 2.1 of the report now submitted, be endorsed and the County Council’s intention to proceed with the creation of a countywide publicly-owned joint venture (the MAC Public Property Partnership) noted; and 

(b) thatthe pragmatic approach taken to date by the authority in respect of maximising the use of our own assets be supported and all further ‘common sense’ sharing opportunities fully explored and expediently delivered wherever that may be possible;

To consider a report by the Assistant Director Environment, Growth & Planning.

(Councillor J A Gray, Executive Councillor for Resources, was in attendance for this Item).

(See Members Interests).

By means of a report by the Assistant Director Environment, Growth and Planning (a copy of which is appended in the Minute Book), the Panel received an update on the work which was taking place between the Council, other Councils in Cambridgeshire and public sector organisations to re-shape and make more efficient use of their property portfolios.

The Panel was reminded that the District Council had to-date taken a common sense approach to making the best use of its property assets and was engaging with partners in this regard. Although there had been limited success thus far with the countywide project, the District Council had achieved some success through re-letting part of the Civic Suite to NHS Cambridgeshire.  In terms of the County Council’s proposal to establish a publicly-owned Joint Venture vehicle, it was suggested the Authority should endorse the principles of this initiative but that further work, analysis and Cabinet approval would be required before the Council made any firm commitment.

Members supported the common sense approach which the District Council had adopted to date but expressed some concern regarding the establishment of the publicly-owned joint venture. Their reservations related to the deliverability of the initiative and its potential costs. Whilst the Executive Councillor shared these reservations, Members were advised that it was important not to preclude the District Council from participating within the arrangement at a later date if it was deemed to be advantageous. In the meantime the Council would continue to look for logical ‘sharing solutions’. Members requested that if any proposals were forthcoming, they should be fully costed for consideration by the Panel.

Members queried the lack of progress which the Making Assets Count initiative appeared to have made on a countywide basis over the course of the last two years and how much the Council had spent on it thus far. They were informed that, despite political consensus about the concept, there had been a number of barriers to its progress, details of which were outlined to Members. The Council’s only contributions had been in the form of Officer and Member time. The consultants who had been appointed to provide property advice had been funded by Improvement East.

In response to a question as to whether there were there were any alternatives to the joint venture approach, the Assistant Director Environment, Growth and Planning explained that one to one discussions with other organisations could be undertaken at any time. He reiterated that the creation of a joint venture might not be required if the common sense approach was applied but it was important to keep the Council’s options open. Members were reminded that the aim of the Making Assets Count Initiative was to make best use of the Council’s assets and the Authority was making good progress in this respect.

In response to a question by Councillor P D Reeve, Members were assured that the Authority was  ...  view the full minutes text for item 29